I was interested in artificialsweetners comments on this release and I checked a few of his/her other comments too. In one comment, the 'slow to speak' boys are mentioned, which makes sense because they also pump out countless reissues of classic house tracks which are hard to find. For the record (no pun intended), I really dislike the 'slow to speak' reissues as they often only include some of the tracks from the original records, with key tracks missing (for example the CVO and Chez Damier twelves) and the sound quality is hit and miss. It is not clear if they are official.This reissue, and all the other ones that currently have danimal's comments underneath, is different in a few ways. First, none of the tracks are missing. Second, the original artwork is included. This gives these records the appearance of being bootlegs or 'replicas' as record shops creatively call them. A less experienced buyer may think they are getting an original copy.I have seen danimal say many times that these are official so let's take his word for that.Perfect then! Brilliant old house tracks that are hard to find on crispy new vinyl. Seem too good to be true? Maybe.I have bought a good few of these; some because I have old worn copies and some because I've never owned the originals. Unlike artificial sweetner, I don't rate the sound quality at all. The remastering seems to have done nothing for the clarity of the sound - if anything it sounds muddy.At least with a 'slow to speak' record, you know what you are buying - it says on the label. With all these 'replica' house twelves floating about, your going to have to be careul and check the run out grooves. I can see the temptation of filling the gaps in your collection with these - like I said earlier, I've bought a few myself. I'm interested to hear what other think about the sound quality and the fact that these look like the OG records, when in reality they are quite different releases to my ears, and I've been collecting since 1993.I'd like to add that I am in no way against reissues and represses - I'm not accusing anyone of anything or trying to start a fight. I have loved all of the recent Echovolt reissues and I think labels like Dark Entries are doing great work. Once again, with both labels it is clear what you are buying and care seems to have been taken with the most important thing - the sound quality.

Thanks for taking the time to read and respond to my comments. I appreciate it. I'm kind of at the point where I don't really have the time or the energy to be the bootleg police, I'd like to support the artists but I also want a clean copy that sounds alright to DJ with and listen to. I haven't heard the original of this record, but the reissue / replica sounds better than the Kerri Chandler shelter record I mentioned. That's damning with faint praise though cause that other one sounds terrible. It's actually kind of a shame how I've been conditioned to have lower expectations from this recent string of reissues, I've only been seriously collecting for a few years. It sounds like you've been around longer and have some perspective so I value your input on sound quality.I agree it's pretty lame how the labels are exactly the same and don't say anything about who or what company is doing the remastering and reissuing. All we really have to go on is a basically anonymous guy named danimal on a website. Dark Entries and Echovolt are doing it the right way for sure. They're putting their name on it and paying homage to important work from the past and paying for rights to release stuff as far as I know. I sure haven't received a brand new record from either of those labels covered in paper scuffs and don't expect to. Some of this 90's stuff from above board seems to be lacking in quality control and that's pretty disrespectful, the transaction is akin to buying a pair of Oakleys from an Asian lady at a streetcorner stand. I guess my last word on it is if it's a bootleg / replica put out a good sounding one, it's been done before.

Really nice reissue - big thick record with clear sounding tracks. Sounds crispier than the Kerri Chandler Atmosphere shelter reissue which was a little distorted sounding to me, I'm not really sure they remastered that one. Oddly, both have sleeve wear on the records even though I got them brand new but that's all good. Glad to have this one at a reasonable price

Anybody willingly to sell this?

Yes I have a copy. I am in Australia.

When this was initially released I bet it was a monstrous UG hit, but soon after certain Brighton based big beat producer lifted vocals from it to his monstrous hit and after that every one knew the lyrics. It's actually a bit sad that 'I Get Deep' is better know as a sample source than for its own merits. I mean, the original version, that's where it's at! Dirty, deep, lurkin', groovin', and those spoken vocals. This timeless production will tear any dance floor, anywhere, anytime. The remixes aren't that bad, but compared to the original they just sound very standard DJ tools. Needless to say this is a must have for anyone, whether you get it just for the accapella or then for the original mix.

prob norman cook aka fatboy slim???

May i ask about which producer from Brighton you are talking? And you are right, it's definitely more known as sample source. I just know of two artists that sampled it. Just heard the original today for the first time. Should've checked out the original sooner. If this doesn't get one moving, what will?